翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Badger ・ R v Bailey ・ R v Baillie ・ R v Barger ・ R v Bartle ・ R v Basi ・ R v Beaulac ・ R v Belnavis ・ R v Betts and Ridley ・ R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ・ R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission ・ R v Blaue ・ R v Bonjon ・ R v Boucher ・ R v Bourke ・ R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3) ・ R v Bowden ・ R v Brown ・ R v Bryan ・ R v Brydges ・ R v Buhay ・ R v Burgess ・ R v Burgess; Ex parte Henry ・ R v Burlingham ・ R v Butler ・ R v Béland ・ R v Canadian Dredge & Dock Co Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust In R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust the House of Lords ruled that a man who had been informally admitted to a psychiatric hospital without capable consent had not been unlawfully detained under the common law. A later European Court of Human Rights ruling, however, found that the man had been unlawfully deprived of his liberty in the meaning of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. ==Facts== HL was an adult male who was autistic and had profound learning disabilities. He had lived in Bournewood Hospital from the age of 13 for over thirty years. In 1994 he was discharged into the community to live in an adult foster placement with carers Mr and Mrs 'E'. On 22 July 1997 HL became agitated at a day centre he attended, and was admitted to the Accident and Emergency Department at Bournewood Hospital under sedation. Due to the sedative, HL was compliant and did not resist admission, so doctors chose not to admit him using powers of detention under the Mental Health Act. HL never attempted to leave the hospital, but his carers were prevented from visiting him in order to prevent him leaving with them. A report by the Health Service Ombudsman〔Health Service Ombudsman, (2001) 'Case No. E. 2280/98-99 ' 〕 heard evidence from a range of professionals that the standard of HL's care had been poor in the hospital, and he had become distressed and agitated. Mr and Mrs 'E' sought from the court a judicial review of the decision of the Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust "to detain the appellant on 22 July 1997 and the Trust's ongoing decision to continue the Appellant's retention" and a writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum to direct that HL be discharged and returned to their care. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.